Global Humanitarian Forum Report: Global Warming Crisis Reaching "Catastrophic" Level

So many people are talking about this "new report from the Global Humanitarian Forum"...but every link I found to this report seems to be dead. Does anyone know where in Internet the report could be accessible?

R JG, my question is honest and sincere.  How, exactly, do "... 300,000 people die every year as the result of climate change."  I have read this report of relativistic hogwash and my question is still valid.  No relevant information can be gleaned from this 135 page document based on arbitrary standards and whimsical postulations. My point is that a collectivist group (the UN) is attempting to cloak their agenda under the premise that industrialized nations are killing third-world individuals.  Besides, I let the professors and politicians spew the rhetoric.  Now, if you would like brand my comment with "it's all their fault", go right ahead.  Please notice, the word "fault" implies that someone has done something wrong and did not appear once in my original post.  I'm not talking about fault, I'm talking about a better way to ensure one's own survival, at a cost to no one else.  I know for certain that if I were in their (these third-world people that we're killing) shoes, I'd find a way to feed my entire family, and probably make a buck or two at the same time...all-the-while not imposing my will onto someone else.  As for your other point:  In the last 100 years, our "economic existence [has been] better than subsistence" partially due to the facts that: 1) Americans are the most crafty and innovative creatures currently on the face of this planet, bar none. 2) Our government, until the mid-1900's left us alone to work...to produce...to create.  As far as "history goes", if you would like to fall in line as an "offshoot of the European tribes", be my guest.  I'll be an American, nothing more, certainly nothing less.  As to your final "nothing lasts forever" point:  You are correct.  This is a little law, albeit a universal law, called "entropy".  Politically speaking, the conservative person will seek to keep this system (the US) in equilibrium, while the progressive person will rush headlong into the wind to see that entropy takes place at a "progressive" rate.    I won't claim that conservatism is perfect, but it is certainly better than the alternative.  

You say "The figures are staggering, to say the least".

Er...yes. That's because they're nonsense.

This isn't evidence. It's computer-modeled hysteria.

John G,  Are your questions rhetorical or do you really want to find out. Suggestion. Log onto the website (http://assets.ghf-ge.org/downloads/humanimpactreport.pdf) download the report and then read it. You may learn something.  

On the issue of "It's all their fault".  It has only been in the last 100 years that people of the European tribes and their offshoots in the US and Australia have had an economic existence better than subsistance.  In historical terms the "blink of an eye."  I wouldn't talk too soon about fault and overstocked grocery shelves.  Nothing lasts forever and sometime forever may be closer than you think.

The UN is a discredited organization and the Man Made Global Warming concept is going to be fought and fought tooth and nail. Thanks to Barrack Oabama and his Marxist blitzkrieg, the American public are now becoming sufficiently alarmed enough to generate the backlash. This backlash imho, will be strong enough to expose the whole myth of Man Made Glabal Warming for the carbon-based control effort it really is. To Hell with the Gore/Strong/UN/Obama/sorros/Marxist ideology and the Tyranny they envision as necessary to implement it !

We're getting ready for you now, boys. You cannot stifle free will. You cannot subjugate that which was given to us.

Please, pardon my ignorance.  How, exactly, do "... 300,000 people die every year as the result of climate change."  Every news story that I have found so far uses this number, but none have identified exactly how one might die due to "climate change".  The claim that "(99 percent) of these deaths occur...[due to] less food being grown" because of a rise in temperature is false and misleading.  If someone dies because they do not have enough to eat, it is called starvation, not "climate change".  Had it not been for innovation and an entrepreneurial spirit, our country would still be using third-world farming techniques and suffering from mass starvation.  When was the last time you visited a grocery store with barren shelves?  It is this affluent, energy-consuming nation that has provided more technology and innovation to the rest of the world than any other.  Instead of calling on the "established nations" to throw wads of cash at this "humanitarian challenge", why doesn't the Global Humanitarian Forum call on these helpless victim-states to improve their technologies and become better equipped to help themselves?